All Issue

2022 Vol.55, Issue 3 Preview Page

Original research article

Growth Characteristics and Physiological Responses of Soybean (Glycine max L.) under Excessive Soil Moisture Stress
Hyen Chung Chun1*
,
Sanghun Lee1
,
Dong Hyok Gong1
,
Won-Chan Kim2
,
Sang-Hyeob Lee3
,
Ki Yuol Jung4
1Researcher, Crop Production Technology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA, Miryang 50424, Korea
2Professor, Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
3Graduate Student, Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
4Senior Researcher, Crop Production Technology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA, Miryang 50424, Korea
*Corresponding Author
31 August 2022. pp. 185-197
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Due to global climate change and poor drainage soil characteristic in paddy fields, soybeans which are one of main upland crops in Korea are prone to get stressed by excessive soil moisture during cultivation. Excessive soil moisture stress causes poor growth, yield loss, and disease to soybeans. In order to prevent damages by excessive soil moisture stress, it is important to understand responses of soybeans under excessive soil moisture condition. Therefore, this study investigated morphological and physiological responses of soybeans by excessive soil moisture at various growth stages; V2, R1, R3, R5 and whole growing period. Soybeans were planted and characteristics of photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxilic acid (ACC) were measured from leaves after excessive soil moisture treatment. After harvest, growth and yield components were measured. As a result, soybean showed the smallest stalk height from soybeans which had excessive soil moisture at V2 and whole growing period. On the other hand, the greatest yield loss occurred when excessive soil moisture applied at R5, while the smallest at R2 and whole growing period. Soybean leaves showed the smallest photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance under excessive soil moisture condition. These decline continued at least 1 week and restored to the values of photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance from soybeans with no stress. Soybeans under excessive soil moisture exhibited greater ACC values than one of no stress. These increment of ACC continued 2 weeks and diminished. Soybeans treated with excessive soil moisture at V2, R1, R3 and whole growing period had decrease in photosynthetic rate and increase in ACC values. These results can indicate that changes of ACC contents in soybean leaves may be used as indicator of excessive soil moisture stress.

Distributions of 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxilic acid (ACC) content from soybean leaves located at bottom with excessive soil moisture treatments at various growth stages; V2, R1, R3, R5, Whole (whole growing period) and Control (no excessive soil moisture treatment).
Keywords
1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxilic acid
Excessive soil moisture
Soybean
References
1
Abeles, F.B., P.W. Morgan, and M.E. Saltveit. 1992. Ethylene in plant biology. Academic Press, New York, USA.
2
Ahmed, S., E. Nawata, and T. Sakuratani. 2006. Changes of endogenous ABA and ACC, and their correlations to photosynthesis and water relations in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczak cv. KPS1) during waterlogging. Environ. Exp. Bot. 57:278-284. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.06.006
3
Ahmed, S., E. Nawata, and T. Sakuratani. 2015. Effects of waterlogging at vegetative and reproductive growth stages on photosynthesis, leaf water potential and yield in mungbean. Plant Prod. Sci. 5:117-123. 10.1626/pps.5.117
4
Ara, R., M.A. Mannan, Q.A. Khaliq, and M.M.U. Miah. 2015. Waterlogging tolerance of soybean. Bangladesh Agron. J. 18(2):105-109. 10.3329/baj.v18i2.28912
5
Banga, M., E.J. Slaa, C.W. Blom, and L.A. Voesenek. 1996. Ethylene biosynthesis and accumulation under drained and submerged conditions (a comparative study of two Rumex species). Plant Physiol. 112:229-237. 10.1104/pp.112.1.22912226386PMC157941
6
Belford, R.K. 1981. Response of winter wheat to prolonged waterlogging under outdoor conditions. J. Agric. Sci. 97:557-568. 10.1017/S0021859600036881
7
Board, J.E. 2008. Waterlogging effects on plant nutrient concentrations in soybean. J. Plant Nutr. 31:828-838. 10.1080/01904160802043122
8
Bradford, K.J. and S.F. Yang. 1981. Physiological responses of plants to waterlogging. Hort. Sci. 16:25-30.
9
Buttery, B.R., C.S. Tan, R.I. Buzzell, J.D. Gaynor, and D.C. Mactavish. 1993. Stomatal number of soybean and response to water stress. Plant Soil 149:283-288. 10.1007/BF00016619
10
Castonguay, Y., P. Nadeau, and R.R. Simard. 1993. Effects of flooding on carbohydrate and ABA levels in roots and shoots of alfalfa. Plant Cell Environ. 16:695-702. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00488.x
11
Chun, H.C., S.H. Lee, D.H. Gong, K.Y. Jung, J.Y. Cho, Y.N. Kim, and Y.B. Lee. 2021a. Difference in biochemical properties of soils with different periods of agricultural practice after conversion from paddies to uplands. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 54(4):467-477. 10.7745/KJSSF.2021.54.4.467
12
Chun, H.C., S.H. Lee, D.H. Gong, K.Y. Jung, H.J. Cho, Y.N. Kim, and Y.B. Lee. 2021b. Differences in soil chemistry and microbial community between the upland converted from paddy and the existing soybean upland. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 54(4):525-537. 10.7745/KJSSF.2021.54.4.525
13
Evans, R.O., R.W. Skaggs, and R.E. Sneed. 1990. Normalized crop susceptibility factors for corn and soybean to excess water stress. Trans. ASAE 33(4):1153-1161. 10.13031/2013.31452
14
Evans, R.O., R.W. Skaggs, and R.E. Sneed. 1991. Stress day index models to predict corn and soybean relative yield under high water table conditions. Trans. ASAE 34(5):1997-2005. 10.13031/2013.31829
15
Griffin, J.L. and A.M. Saxton. 1988. Response of solid-seeded soybean to flood irrigation. II. Flood duration. Agron. J. 80:885-888. 10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000060009x
16
Guang, C., W. Xiugui, L. Yu, and L. Wenbing. 2012. Effect of water logging stress on cotton leaf area index and yield. Procedia Eng. 28:202-209. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.706
17
Hiler, E.A. 1969. Quantitative evaluation of crop-drainage requirements. Trans. ASAE 12(4):499-505. 10.13031/2013.38876
18
Hiler, E.A. and R.N. Clark. 1971. Stress day index to characterize effects of water stress on crop yields. Trans. ASAE 14(4):757-761. 10.13031/2013.38384
19
Jackson, M.B. 2002. Long-distance signalling from roots to shoots assessed: The flooding story. J. Exp. Bot. 53:175-181. 10.1093/jexbot/53.367.17511807120
20
Jeon, W.T., C.Y. Park, K.D. Park, Y.S. Cho, J.S. Lee, and D.C. Lee. 2002. Changes of soil characteristics, rice growth and lodging traits by different fertilization and drainage system in paddy soil. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 35(3):153-161.
21
Jung, K.Y., E.S. Yun, C.Y. Park, J.B. Hwang, Y.D. Choi, and K.D. Park. 2011. Stress day index to predict soybean yield response by subsurface drainage in poorly drained sloping paddy fields. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 44(5):702-708. 10.7745/KJSSF.2011.44.5.702
22
KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration). 2020. Korean climate change assessment report 2020. ISBN 978-89-954715-8-6. Ministry of Environment, Seoul, Korea.
23
KOSIS (Korean Statistical Information Service). 2021. Crop production statistics 2021. Statistics Korea, Seoul, Korea.
24
Linkemer, G., J.E. Board, and M.E. Musgrave. 1998. Waterlogging effects on growth and yield components in late-planted soybean. Crop Sci. 38:1576-1584. 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800060028x11541446
25
Lone, A.A. and M.Z.K. Warsi. 2009. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) to excess soil moisture (ESM) tolerance at different stages of life cycle. Bot. Res. Int. 2:211-217.
26
Luan, H., B. Guo, H. Shen, Y. Pan, Y. Hong, C. Lv, and R. Xu. 2020. Overexpression of barley transcription factor HvERF2.11 in Arabidopsis enhances plant waterlogging tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:1982. 10.3390/ijms2106198232183237PMC7139581
27
NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Science). 2010. Method of soil chemical analysis. Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Korea.
28
Ok, J.H., S.A. Hwang, H.S. Lee, and B.Y. Oh. 2021. Estimation of upland soil loss and canopy cover subfactor under soybean cultivation using slope lysimeter. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 54(4):651-659. 10.7745/KJSSF.2021.54.4.651
29
Olivella, C., C. Biel, M. Vendrell, and R. Save. 2000. Hormonal and physiological responses of Gerbera jamesonii to flooding stress. Hort. Sci. 35:222-225. 10.21273/HORTSCI.35.2.222
30
Palta, J.A., A. Ganjeali, N.C. Turner, and K.H.M. Siddique. 2010. Effects of transient subsurface waterlogging on root growth, plant biomass and yield of chickpea. Agric. Water Manag. 97(10):1469-1476. 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.05.001
31
Park, S.J., J.Y. Park, K.C. Eom, and J.K. Moon. 2014. Determination of water use efficiency on the amount of water use for 29 Korean soybean cultivars. Korean J. Breed. Sci. 46(4):381-388. 10.9787/KJBS.2014.46.4.381
32
Puiatti, M. and L. Sodek. 1999. Waterlogging affects nitrogen transport in the xylem of soybean. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 37(10):767-773. 10.1016/S0981-9428(00)86690-5
33
RDA (Rural Development Administration). 2016. Good practice of agricultural technology 202; soybean. Rural Development Administration, Wanju, Korea.
34
Ren, B., J. Zhang, X. Li, and X. Fan. 2014. Effects of waterlogging on the yield and growth of summer maize under field conditions. Can. J. Plant Sci. 94(1):23-31. 10.4141/cjps2013-175
35
Rhine, N., G. Stevens, G. Shannon, A. Wrather, and D. Sleper. 2010. Yield and nutritional responses to waterlogging of soybean cultivars. Irrig. Sci. 28:135-142. 10.1007/s00271-009-0168-x
36
Sairam, R.K., D. Kumutha, K. Ezhilmathi, P.S. Deshmukh, and G.C. Srivastava. 2008. Physiology and biochemistry of waterlogging tolerance in plants. Biol. Plant. 52:401-412. 10.1007/s10535-008-0084-6
37
Sathi, K.S., A.A.C. Masud, T.I. Anee, K. Rahman, N. Ahmed, and M. Hasanuzzaman. 2022. Soybean plants under waterlogging stress: Responses and adaptation mechanisms. pp. 103-134. In M. Hasanuzzaman (ed.) Managing plant production under changing environment. Springer, Singapore. 10.1007/978-981-16-5059-8_5
38
Scott, H.D., J. DeAngulo, M.B. Daniels, and L.S. Wood. 1989. Flood duration effects on soybean growth and yield. Agron. J. 81:631-636. 10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100040016x
39
Shao, G.C., J.J. Lan, S.E. Yu, N. Liu, R.Q. Guo, and D.L. She. 2013. Photosynthesis and growth of winter wheat in response to waterlogging at different growth stages. Phtosynthetica 51(3):429-437. 10.1007/s11099-013-0039-9
40
Sung, F.J.M. 1993. Waterlogging effect on nodule nitrogenase and leaf nitrate reductase activities in soybean. Field Crops Res. 35:183-189. 10.1016/0378-4290(93)90152-D
41
Umaharan, P., R.P. Ariyanayagam, and S.Q. Haque. 1997. Effect of short-term waterlogging applied at various growth phases on growth, development and yield in Vigna unguiculata. J. Agric. Sci. 128:189-198. 10.1017/S0021859696004121
42
VanToai, T.T., T.T.C. Hoa, N.T.N. Hue, H.T. Nguyen, J.G. Shannon, and M.A. Rahman. 2010. Flooding tolerance of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] germplasm from Southeast Asia under field and screen-house environments. Open Agric. J. 4:38-46. 10.2174/1874331501004010038
43
Vartapetian, B.B. and M.B. Jackson. 1997. Plant adaptations to anaerobic stress. Ann. Bot. 79:3-20. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a010303
44
Voesenek, L.A.C.J. and J. Bailey-Serres. 2015. Flood adaptive traits and processes: An overview. New Phytol. 206:57-73. 10.1111/nph.1320925580769
45
Wang, X., Z. Deng, W. Zhang, Z. Meng, X. Chang, and M. Lv. 2017. Effect of waterlogging duration at different growth stages on the growth, yield and quality of cotton. PLoS One 12:e0169029. 10.1371/journal.pone.016902928045994PMC5207501
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society of Soil Science and Fertilizer
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국토양비료학회
  • Journal Title :Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국토양비료학회 학회지
  • Volume : 55
  • No :3
  • Pages :185-197
  • Received Date : 2022-06-29
  • Revised Date : 2022-07-19
  • Accepted Date : 2022-07-21
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2022.55.3.185
Journal Informaiton Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer
KJSSF Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close