Original research article

Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer. 31 August 2024. 154-163
https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2024.57.3.154

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •   Experimental setup and treatment

  •   Sampling and analysis

  •   Statistical analysis

  • Results and Discussion

  •   Growth and aboveground biomass yield

  • Conclusions

Introduction

Plants require mineral nutrients to complete their growth and development, and, of those, nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and sulfur (S) are classified as macronutrients due to relatively large amounts (Maschner, 1995). N functions as an essential component of amino acids, nucleic acids, chlorophyll, vitamins, and thus is greatly responsible for quantitative growth of plants (Maathuis, 2009). More than 90% of soil P is strongly fixed, and this results in extremely low availability of plants. P plays a role to constitute nucleic acids, cellular energy (e.g. ATP) and cell membrane (Maathuis, 2009). K, varying between 0.1 and 1.0 mM in the soil solution, is relatively easily absorbed, and directly involve cellular metabolic reactions via activating a multitude of enzymes and precisely manipulate water homeostasis like stomatal opening/closure (Britto and Kronzucker, 2008).

In context of an availability of mineral nutrients, nutrient use efficiency (NUE) is widely adopted as an important index to evaluate the uptake, utilization and recovery of mineral nutrients by crop plants (Dobermann, 2007). Therefore, many studies have addressed to emphasize an importance of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) as a crop functionality (Bhardwaj et al., 2021; Miao et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2022; Ma et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2023).

Sorghum-sudangrass hybrid is a subtropical crop preferring the relatively higher temperature for greater production and nutritional quality (Choi et al., 2022), and, the cultivation scale is increasingly extended to compensate livestock feed requirement (Pedersen, 1996; Reddy et al., 2005). Additionally, due to an advantage of summer season-producing system ensuring greater biomass (Choi et al., 2017), sorghum-sudangrass hybrid is required to be more tolerant/resistant against abiotic stresses such as drought and high temperature compared to other forage crops (Yoon et al., 2007; Uzun et al., 2009).

Despite many reports on fertilization efficiency and biomass production of forage crops, there is limited information on sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. Therefore, it is necessary to know whether difference application rates of N, P2O5 or K2O affect nutrient use efficiency and biomass production, and the objective of the current study is to suggest the optimal NPK fertilization rate with an evaluation of nutrients (N, P2O5, K2O) use efficiency based on nutrient uptake and biomass production of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid.

Materials and Methods

Experimental setup and treatment

This work was performed at the experimental field in Chungbuk Agricultural Research and Extension Service (CARES) from May to August, 2022. Experimental plot was arranged with a randomized block design (60 m2 per treatment, 3 replications). Seeds of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (cv. SX17, heading type) were strip-sown with a furrow of 50 cm (width, 40 kg ha-1) at 10th May, 2022. Compared to the optimum range of soil chemistry for forage crop production (NAAS, 2022), an experimental soil showed lower organic matter (OM) and exchangeable potassium (K), whereas pH, available phosphate (P2O5) and exchangeable calcium (Ca) were higher (Table 1). Compost was applied as a basal fertilizer at a rate of 10 tons ha-1. The standard fertilization was 175 kg N, 150 kg P2O5 and 150 kg K2O ha-1, and N was split with three times as a rate of 40 (basal): 30 (20 days after sowing, DAS): 30% (45 DAS), and total requirement of P2O5 and K2O were applied as a basal fertilization on 4th May, 2022. To develop variable N, P2O5 and K2O levels, the dose was divided into four different levels; 0, 50, 100 and 200 % to the standard fertilization rate (Table 2). An experimental soil was analyzed according to NAAS method (NAAS, 2010). The pH and EC were measured with pH/EC meter (sampled soil : ddH2O = 1:5). Total soil carbon (dried soil) was measured with a C/N analyzer (VarioMax CN Analyzer, Elementar GmbH, Germany), and transformed to organic matter with multiplying by 1.724. An available phosphate extracted with Lancaster method was measured with UV-Spectrometer (720nm, UV 1900i, Shimadzu, Japan). The cations (5 g of dried soil) were analyzed with ICP-OES equipment (INTEGRA XMP, GBC, Australia) after an extraction (50 mL of 1 N CH2COONH4, pH 7.0).

Table 1.

Physicochemical properties of the soil

Physico-
chemical
properties
Soil
Series
Soil
Texture
pH
(1:5)
EC
(dS m-1, 1:5)
T-N
(g kg-1)
OM
(g kg-1)
Av. P2O5
(mg kg-1)
Exch. Cations (cmolc kg-1)
K Ca Mg
Seogcheon Sandy Loam 7.3 0.68 0.14 16.2 740 0.27 7.9 1.5
Optimal1 - - 6.0-7.0 - - 20-30 300-550 0.5-0.8 5.0-6.0 1.5-2.0

1Optimal means the recommendation by Rural Development Administration (RDA, 2022).

Table 2.

Fertilization rate of N, P2O5 or K2O

Treatment
(kg ha-1)
Basal
(kg ha-1)
Supplemental
(kg ha-1)1
Total
(kg ha-1)
N P2O5 K2O N N P2O5 K2O
N 0 - 150 150 - - 150 150
87.5 50 150 150 37.5 87.5 150 150
175 100 150 150 75 175 150 150
350 200 150 150 150 350 150 150
P2O5 0 100 - 150 75 175 - 150
75 100 75 150 75 175 75 150
150 100 150 150 75 175 150 150
300 100 300 150 75 175 300 150
K2O 0 100 150 - 75 175 150 -
75 100 150 75 75 175 150 75
150 100 150 150 75 175 150 150
300 100 150 300 75 175 150 300

1Supplemental N was applied at 40 days after sowing.

2Standard fertilization of N, P2O5 and K2O was 175, 150 and 150 kg ha-1, respectively (NAAS, 2022).

Sampling and analysis

The shoots (leaves + stems) of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid were taken at harvest stage (85 days after sowing, DAS) from each treatment (50 × 50 cm, 3 replications), immediately divided into leaves and stems after washing with deionized-distilled water, and dried at 72°C for 48 hrs. After measuring dry weight (biomass), the powdered leaves and stems (500 mg, DW) were mixed with 5 mL of 368 mmol L-1 of salicylic acid in 84.7% sulfuric acid (H2SO4, v/v) for 24 h and wet-digested at 300°C for 6 hrs, followed by the addition of several drops of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), transferred to a 100 mL volumetric flask and diluted to 100 mL with deionized water for the mineral analysis. Nitrogen was determined using a C/N analyzer (VarioMax CN Analyzer, Elementar, Germany) with manufacturer’s manual. Phosphorus was measured using the molybdate-blue colorimetry method (UV-2450, Shimadzu, Japan). Potassium (K) was measured using an ICP-OES equipment (INTEGRA XMP, GBC, Australia) according to manufacturer’s manual.

Nutrient use efficiencies (NUEs) were calculated with samples taken at the harvest stage using the following formulas (Dobermann, 2007).

(Eq. 1)
Nutrientuseefficiency(NUE):(YY0)/F(kgkg-1)
(Eq. 2)
Nutrientuptakeefficiency(NUpE):(UU0)/F(kgkg-1)
(Eq. 3)
Nutrientutilizationefficiency(NUtE):(YY0)/(UU0)(kgkg-1)
(Eq. 4)
Internalutilizationefficiency(IE):Y/U(kgkg-1)
(Eq. 5)
Partialfactorefficiency(PFE):Y/F(kgkg-1)

Where Y is yield (kg ha-1) of crop with fertilization and Y0 is without fertilization. U is uptake (kg ha-1) by aboveground biomass with fertilization and U0 is without fertilization. F means fertilization rate (kg ha-1).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and, if p < 0.05, were subjected to Duncan multiple range test (DMRT) to detect significant differences among the means (RStudio VER. 4.2.2).

Results and Discussion

Growth and aboveground biomass yield

Improving nutrient use efficiency of crop plants is essential for effective fertilization management. This study focused on evaluating the use efficiency of N, P, or K in a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (cv. SX17). Agronomic growth parameters of the hybrid plant grown under different levels of N, P2O5 or K2O fertilization were measured at harvesting stage (Table 1). Indeed, standard fertilization rates of N, P2O5 or K2O significantly promoted plant height. Leaf length and width varied significantly with N rates, showing the greatest at 175 kg N, and K2O fertilization (75 and 150 kg ha-1) also noticeably increased leaf length. By contrast, stem diameter was not significantly affected by varying levels of N, P2O5 or K2O fertilization. Interestingly, the yield of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid, measured as dry matter (kg ha-1), was not greatly affected by different levels of N, P2O5 or K2O fertilization, however there was a consistent trend corresponding to fertilization rates, except for at the highest supply level (Table 3 and Fig. 1). In fact, studies have documented that growth performance of sorghum varieties is reported to have a diverse range by genotype, production phase, harvest age, grain quality and nutritional content (Shegro et al., 2012; Sajimin et al., 2018). Furthermore, biomass yield of sorghum was obtained with 14.5 -21.1 Mg ha-1 affected by various NPK fertilization rates (Weldegebriel et al., 2018), and greater contributor to yield improvement was N fertilization and followed by P2O5 and K2O (Li et al., 2010). From our results, the recommended rates of N (175 kg ha-1), P2O5 (150 kg ha-1) or K2O (150 kg ha-1) were found to be highly effective for biomass production in the sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. Water and N interactions were highlighted as major factors influencing growth and yield, as suggested Gonzalez-Dugo et al. (2010) and Sadras et al. (2016). Overall, higher fertilization rates of N, P2O5 or K2O directly enhanced agronomic traits including biomass production. Nevertheless, an increase N, P2O5 or K2O fertilization rates was not effective to growth promotion.

Table 3.

Growth of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid by different N, P2O5 or K2O fertilization levels

Fertilization
(kg ha-1, N- P2O5- K2O)
Plant height
(cm)
Leaf length
(cm)
Leaf width
(cm)
Stem diameter
(mm)
Dry matter
(kg ha-1)
N 0-0-0 310.8 ± 31.7 b1 85.4 ± 2.7 b 4.7 ± 1.0 b 7.4 ± 0.8 b 14,990 ± 857 b
87.5-150-150 328.7 ± 27.9 ab 95.6 ± 5.5 a 5.6 ± 0.7 ab 8.8 ± 1.3 ab 18,550 ± 315 a
175-150-150 358.0 ± 18.4 a 98.4 ± 6.1 a 6.2 ± 1.0 a 9.3 ± 1.1 a 19,301 ± 429 a
350-150-150 337.7 ± 39.6 ab 93.0 ± 4.8 a 5.6 ± 0.8 ab 8.7 ± 2.4 ab 16,331 ± 578 b
F-value 3.762(*) 11.417(***) 4.320(*) 2.702(*) 4.667(*)
P2O5 0-0-0 324.8 ± 37.3 ab 87.9 ± 11.8 ns 4.3 ± 0.8 ns 8.3 ± 1.3 ns 14,366 ± 1,2571 c
175-75-150 297.9 ± 30.0 b 88.7 ± 4.9 3.9 ± 0.6 8.5 ± 1.0 16,770 ± 707b c
175-150-150 338.9 ± 23.2 a 89.4 ± 7.6 4.7 ± 0.5 9.1 ± 1.1 20,308 ± 964 a
175-300-150 299.2 ± 30.1 b 93.9 ± 3.5 4.3 ± 0.4 9.5 ± 1.1 18,410 ± 1,305 ab
F-value 3.879(*) 1.620 ns 1.895 0.95 8.444(**)
K2O 0-0-0 322.8 ± 33.6 b 89.8 ± 3.1 b 4.5 ± 0.5 ns 9.5 ± 1.1 ab 15,940 ± 821 ns
175-150-75 354.7 ± 20.1 ab 99.9 ± 4.3 a 4.6 ± 0.7 9.4 ± 0.7 b 17,229 ± 1,010
175-150-150 367.9 ± 30.2 a 99.6 ± 4.7 a 4.6 ± 0.5 10.7 ± 1.3 a 17,467 ± 666
175-150-300 326.3 ± 25.1 b 93.6 ± 2.7 b 4.2 ± 0.9 8.9 ± 0.8 b 15,701 ± 607
F-value 5.615(**) 14.902(***) 0.831 4.891(*) 1.5

1The same letter in a column means no significant difference by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05, n = 3).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ksssf/2024-057-03/N0230570302/images/ksssf_2024_573_154_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

Yield response of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid under different levels of N, P2O5 or K2O fertilization. Sorghum-sudangrass hybrid plants were harvested at 80 days after sowing from each treatment (50 × 50 cm, n = 3).

The uptake of N and K in the sorghum-sudangrass hybrid plant was substantially affected by fertilization rates of N or K2O, whereas P2O5 uptake did not differ (Table 4). Compared to the control (0-0-0 kg ha-1), nitrogen uptake increased by 25.5% at 87.5N kg ha-1, 25.9% at 175N kg ha-1 and 60.3% at 350N kg ha-1. Potassium (K2O) uptake was 16.9% greater at 75K kg ha-1, 52.1% greater at 150K kg ha-1 and 52.9% greater at 300K kg ha-1 compared to the control. Compared to the standard N fertilization (175 kg ha-1), a 50% reduced-N application did not affect N uptake, whereas a 200% increase in N supply resulted in a noticeable rise. In contrast, a 50% reduction in K2O fertilization led to a significant 76.9% reduction in K uptake, while doubling the K2O fertilization rate resulted in no significant change (100.5%). Based on the results of nutrient uptake and biomass production, nutrient use efficiencies were evaluated (Table 4). Nutrient uptake efficiency (NUpE) showed significant difference (p < 0.05) with N treatments, indicating a decreasing trend with increasing N fertilization. Different levels of P2O5 or K2O fertilization did not affect NUpE. Nutrient utilization efficiency (NUtE) also tended to decrease gradually with increased fertilization rates of N (p < 0.01) and K2O (p < 0.05). Consequently, nutrient use efficiency (NUE), expressed as the product of NUpE and NUtE, was significant in N treatments (p < 0.01), with values of 40.7 kg kg-1 (50% of N), 24.6 kg kg-1 (100% of N) and 3.8 kg kg-1 (200% of N). P- or K-use efficiency did not differ significantly among different fertilizer- P2O5 or - K2O application rates although the highest NUE was observed at the standard rate, indicating 34.0 kg kg-1 for P2O5 and 8.7 kg kg-1 for K2O. An internal utilization efficiency (IE) was reduced by an increasing N or K2O fertilization rates, whereas remained consistently in P2O5. Additionally, a partial factor efficiency (PFE) was also significantly declined in N treatment, whilst an increasing P2O5 fertilization resulted in higher PFE. In terms of PFE, an increase in P2O5 fertilization could promote biomass production (DW) of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. In line with previous investigations (Gheith et al., 2022; Sharma et al., 2022; Sigua et al., 2018), higher N fertilization substantially decreased the N use efficiency compared to lower N rate. Additionally, several studies recommend coupling N supply with crop requirements during the cropping season as an ideal practice to improve NUE by reducing N loss (Asibi et al., 2019; Qiu et al., 2015; Srivastava et al., 2018). Zhu et al. (2012) estimated an optimal P2O5 fertilization range of 127 to 150 kg ha-1, calculated from a regression model for P use efficiency, which aligns with our results. There were conflicting results regarding K use efficiency, with some studies reporting no difference (Sharma et al., 2022) and decrease (Brhane et al., 2017) under increasing K2O fertilization rates. Therefore, our study showed that increased N fertilization rates evidently reduced N availability (uptake and utilization), whereas different P and K rates had an indirectly influence on their use efficiency.

Table 4.

Nutrient uptake and use efficiencies (NUEs) of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid by different N, P2O5 or K2O fertilization levels

Treatment (kg ha-1, N- P2O5- K2O) Uptake (kg ha-1) NUpE (kg kg-1) NUtE (kg kg-1) NUE (kg kg-1)
N 0-0-0 164.4 ± 25.87 b - - -
87.5-150-150 206.3 ± 0.70 ab 2.1 ± 0.7 a 19.5 ± 3.2 a 40.7 ± 12.7 a
175-150-150 207.0 ± 45.46 ab 1.9 ± 0.4 ab 13.1 ± 2.0 ab 24.6 ± 7.2 ab
350-150-150 263.5 ± 21.98 a 0.6 ± 0.2 b 7.1 ± 3.9 a 3.8 ± 2.5 b
F-value 3.172(*) 7.370(*) 11.9(**) 14.103(**)
P2O5 0-0-0 64.5 ± 10.63 ns - - -
175-75-150 72.7 ± 17.19 0.3 ± 0.1 48.0 ± 26.1 13.7 ± 8.4
175-150-150 81.9 ± 16.36 0.4 ± 0.2 100.9 ± 38.0 34.01 ± 1.5
175-300-150 78.0 ± 27.08 0.5 ± 0.1 51.7 ± 23.5 23.1 ± 8.0
F-value 0.487(ns) 1.583(ns) 2.933(ns) 3.45(ns)
K2O 0-0-0 208.6 ± 21.82 b - - -
175-150-75 243.9 ± 19.24 b 1.5 ± 0.4 5.0 ± 0.4 a 7.4 ± 2.2
175-150-150 317.3 ± 81.95 a 2.1 ± 0.3 3.9 ± 3.5 ab 8.7 ± 7.5
175-150-300 318.9 ± 24.43 a 1.4 ± 0.4 -1.0 ± 1.5 b -1.4 ± 2.5
F-value 4.443(*) 3.105(ns) 6.35(*) 4.019(ns)

1NUpE, nutrient uptake efficiency, (U-U0)/F; NUtE, nutrient utilization efficiency, (Y-Y0)/(U-U0); NUE, nutrient use efficiency, (Y-Y0)/F; Y (yield, kg ha-1); U (nutrient uptake, kg ha-1); F (fertilization, kg ha-1).

Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of nutrient use efficiency (NUE) in the sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (cv. SX17) under varying levels of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) fertilizations. Overall, the current study demonstrated that higher fertilization rates of N, P2O5, or K2O promoted agronomic traits and biomass production, although there was a threshold beyond which additional fertilization does not yield further growth benefits. Based on the results of yield and nutrient use efficiency, we suggest that the optimal level of NPK fertilization is 175 kg ha-1 for N, 150 kg ha-1 for P2O5 and 150 kg ha-1 for K2O. Despite our suggestion, improving efficient fertilization practices is essential for maximizing nutrient use without causing environmental or economic drawbacks.

Funding

This work was supported by the “Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (RS-2021-RD009117)”, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Author Contribution

Seo BM: Data curation, Writing-original draft, Visualization, Sung J: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing-review & editing.

Data Availability

Data will be provided on reasonable request.

Acknowledgements

The authors thanks Chungcheongbuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Service for providing the research sites and experimental materials.

References

1

Asibi AE, Chai Q, Coulter JA. 2019. Mechanisms of nitrogen use in maize. Agronomy 9:775. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.09.0533

10.2134/agronj2017.09.0533
2

Bhardwaj AK, Rajwar D, Yadav RK, Chaudhari SK, Sharma DK. 2021. Nitrogen availability and use efficiency in wheat crop as influenced by the organic-input quality under major integrated nutrient management systems. Front. Plant Sci. 12:634448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.634448

10.3389/fpls.2021.63444834093604PMC8170484
3

Brhane H, Mamo T, Teka K. 2017. Optimum potassium fertilization level for growth, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Vertisols of Northern Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric. 3:1347022. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2017.1347022

10.1080/23311932.2017.1347022
4

Britto DT, Kronzucker HJ. 2008. Cellular mechanisms of potassium transport in plants. Physiol. Plant. 133: 637-650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01067.x

10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01067.x18312500
5

Choi K, Lee SH, Lee KW, Chung JH, Hwang TY, Kim KY. 2017. Comparison of growth characteristics, quantity, and feed value between sudanese-sudangrass hybrid and susu-sudangrass hybrid. J. Korean Soc. Grassland Survey and Feed. 37: 92-99. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2017.37.1.92

10.5333/KGFS.2017.37.1.92
6

Choi N, Kim G, Park W, Jeong Y, Kim YH, Na CI. 2022. Additional N application and ecotype affect yield and quality of ratoon harvested sorghum x sudangrass hybrid for temperate regions. Biomass Bioenergy 160:106423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106423

10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106423
7

Dobermann A. 2007. Nutrient use efficiency-measurement and management. Agron. Hortic. Fac. Publ. 1442.

8

Gheith EMS, El-Badry OZ, Lamlom SF, Ali HM, Siddiqui MH, Ghareeb RY, El-Sheikh MH, Jebril J, Abdelsalam NR, Kandil EE. 2022. Maize (Zea mays L.) productivity and nitrogen use efficiency in response to nitrogen application levels and time. Front Plant Sci. 13:941343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.941343

10.3389/fpls.2022.94134335845674PMC9284315
9

Gonzalez-Dugo V, Durand JL, Gastal F. 2010. Water deficit and nitrogen nutrition of crops. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 30:529-544. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009059

10.1051/agro/2009059
10

Lee BY, Sung J. 2023. Yield and nitrogen use efficiency of upland carrot affected by various basal fertilizers and fertigation ratios. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 56:260-269. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2023.56.3.260

10.7745/KJSSF.2023.56.3.260
11

Lee YJ, Kim GE, Oh TK, Sung J. 2022. Yield and nitrogen use efficiencies (NUEs) in open-field pepper: Effect of different types of basal fertilizer and fertigation ratio. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 55:286-298. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2022.55.4.286

10.7745/KJSSF.2022.55.4.286
12

Li WX, Lu JW, Fang C, Li XK. 2010. Effect of NPK application on yield, nutrients and water utilization under sudangrass and ryegrass rotation regime. Agric. Sci. China 9:1026-1034. https://doi:10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60186-3

10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60186-3
13

Ma X, Zhang F, Liu F, Guo G, Cheng T, Wang J, Shen Y, Liang T, Chen X, Wang X. 2022. An integrated nitrogen management strategy promotes open-field pepper yield, crop nitrogen uptake, and nitrogen use efficiency in southwest China. Agriculture 12:524. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040524

10.3390/agriculture12040524
14

Maathuis FJM. 2009. Physiological functions of mineral macronutrients. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12:250-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.003

10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.00319473870
15

Maschner H. 1995. Mineral nutrition in higher plants. Academic Press, London, UK.

10.1016/B978-012473542-2/50008-0
16

Miao Q, Zhang J, Chen Y, Xue Y, Cui Z. 2021. Integrated nitrogen amount and sources maximize maize nitrogen efficiency in the saline soils. Agron. J. 113:1183-1196. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20584

10.1002/agj2.20584
17

NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Science). 2010. Methods of soil analysis. RDA, Suwon, Korea.

18

NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Science). 2022. Fertilization standard on crops (5th revision). RDA, Suwon, Korea.

19

Pedersen JF. 1996. In: Janick J (Ed.), Annual forages: New approaches for C-4 forages, Progress in New Crops, ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, pp. 246-251.

20

Qiu SJ, He P, Zhao SC, Li WJ, Xie JG, Hou YP, Hou CA, Zhou W, Jin JY. 2015. Impact of nitrogen rate on maize yield and nitrogen use efficiencies in northeast China. Agron. J. 107:305-313. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj13.0567

10.2134/agronj13.0567
21

Reddy B, Ramesh S, Reddy P, Ramaiah B, Salimath M, Kachapur R. 2005. Sweet sorghum - a potential alternate raw material for bio-ethanol and bio-energy. Int. Sorghum Millets Newsl. 46:79-86.

22

Sadras VO, Hayman PT, Rodriguez D, Monjardino M, Bielich M, Unkovich M, Mudge B, Wang E. 2016. Interactions between water and nitrogen in Australian cropping systems: physiological, agronomic, economic, breeding and modelling perspectives. Crop Pasture Sci. 67:1019-1053. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP16027

10.1071/CP16027
23

Sajimin S, Purwantari ND, Sarjiman S, Sihono S. 2018. Evaluation on performance of some sorghum bicolor cultivars as forage resources in the dry land with dry climate. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner 22:135-143. https://doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v22i3.1611

10.14334/jitv.v22i3.1611
24

Sharma S, Kaur G, Singh P, Alamri S, Kumar R, Siddiqui MH. 2022. Nitrogen and potassium application effects on productivity, profitability and nutrient use efficiency of irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plos one 17: e0264210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264210

10.1371/journal.pone.026421035609063PMC9129015
25

Shegro A, Shargie NG, van Biljon A, Labuschagne MT. 2012. Diversity in starch, protein and mineral composition of sorghum landrace accessions from Ethiopia. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 15:275-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-012-0008-z

10.1007/s12892-012-0008-z
26

Sigua GC, Stone KC, Bauer PJ, Szogi AA. 2018. Biomass and nitrogen use efficiency of grain sorghum with nitrogen and supplemental irrigation. Agron. J. 110:1119-1127.

10.2134/agronj2017.09.0533
27

Srivastava RK, Panda RK, Chakraborty A, Halder D. 2018. Enhancing grain yield, biomass and nitrogen use efficiency of maize by varying sowing dates and nitrogen rate under rainfed and irrigated conditions. Field Crops Res. 221:339-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.06.019

10.1016/j.fcr.2017.06.019
28

Uzun F, Ugur S, Sulak M. 2009. Yield, nutritional and chemical properties of some sorghum × sudangrass hybrids (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench × Sorghum sudanense Stapf.). J. Animal and Veterinary Advances 8:1602-1608.

29

Weldegebriel R, Araya T, Egziabher YG. 2018. Effect of NPK and blended fertilizer application on nutrient uptake and use efficiency of selected sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) varieties under rain-fed condition in Sheraro District, Northern Ethiopia. Momona Ethiopian J. Sci. 10:140-156. https://doi.org/10.4314/mejs.v10i1.8

10.4314/mejs.v10i1.8
30

Yoon SH, Kim JG, Jeong ES, Sung SH. 2007. The study on double cropping system for organic forage production in middle part of Korea. J. Kor. Grassl. Forage Sci. 19:81-88. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2007.27.4.275

10.5333/KGFS.2007.27.4.275
31

Zhu XK, Li CY, Jiang ZQ, Huang LL, Feng CN, Guo WS, Peng YX. 2012. Responses of phosphorus use efficiency, grain yield, and quality to phosphorus application amount of weak-gluten wheat. J. Integr. Agric. 11:1103-1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60103-8

10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60103-8
페이지 상단으로 이동하기