Characteristics of Maize Roots under Subsurface Drip Irrigation through Various Oxygen Treatment

Dong Hyeok Gong; Sang hun Lee; Ki Yuol Jung; Hyen Chung Chun

doi:10.7745/KJSSF.2023.56.1.039

All Issue

2023 Vol.56, Issue 1 Preview Page Next Page

Original research article

Characteristics of Maize Roots under Subsurface Drip Irrigation through Various Oxygen Treatment

28 February 2023. pp. 39-48

PDF XML

Abstract

In Korea, irrigation technology using subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) is new in agriculture system. Many limitations of SDI are not well known. SDI can damage crops from overwatering. To address this weakness, it is important to improve and test the applicability of the SDI with air injection (oxygation). Therefore we investigated soil oxygen (O₂) and carbon dioxide (CO₂), root characteristics and yield of maize using two conditions of soil moisture regime: field capacity (FC) × 100% and 120%. Maize was planted, and then air was injected by compressor and venturi. In the field, irrigation was controlled by a controller connected to soil moisture sensors. Soil moisture sensors were measured at 20 cm below soil surface. Soil O₂ and CO₂ were measured at 10 and 30 cm below soil surface before and after oxygation. Root activity was measured from tip of roots. Root volume and dry weight were measured. Post-harvest, number and weight of maize ears were surveyed as well. As a result, soil oxygen values increased by 59% in the compressor treatment and by 34% in the venture treatment. However, soil CO₂values did not depend on the oxygation. In all soil moisture treatments, the activity of oxygated roots was greater than that of the control, and root activity was increased by 152%. Root volume and dry weight were also greater than those in the control. No significant effect of soil moisture was found on the number and weight of ears of maize. The average ear weight of maize in the FC 100% soil moisture treatment was 1,292 kg 10a^-1 in the oxygation and 1,278 kg 10a^-1 in the control. In addition, no effect of oxygation was observed on number and weight of ears. The average ear weight of maize in the FC 120% soil moisture treatment was 1,229 kg 10a^-1 in the oxygation and 960 kg 10a^-1 in the control. Maize yield was 28% greater in the oxygation treatment than that in the control. The yield of maize grown in the control field showed a tendency to decrease as the soil moisture content increased. At FC 120% soil moisture, the ear weight of control maize was reduced by 25% compared to FC 100% soil moisture. These results reflected that the oxygation process had a great effect on the root growth even in humid conditions, which was expected to have a positive effect on the maize plants planted above-ground.

Root activity, dry weight and volume of corn as a result of soil moisture and oxygation; Soil moisture treatments (field capacity × 100%, field capacity × 120%), Oxygation treatments (compressor, venturi), Control (no air was injected).

Soil moisture regime	Oxygation treatment	Root activity (µg g^-1 h^-1)	Root dry weight (g)	Root volume (cm³)
100% of field capacity	Compressor	50.1 ± 1.69 b^†	49.5 ± 19.25 a	269 ± 83.8 a
	Venturi	67.8 ± 3.25 a	44.6 ± 10.17 a	224 ± 34.9 a
	Control	32.2 ± 2.08 c	12.5 ± 5.55 b	59 ± 43.8 b
120% of field capacity	Compressor	50.8 ± 1.07 a	42.4 ± 0.74 ab	225 ± 5.0 b
	Venturi	39.2 ± 1.54 b	73.7 ± 25.75 a	326 ± 56.6 a
	Control	35.8 ± 1.52 c	14.6 ± 9.81 b	60 ± 48.2 c

^†a, b and c represent significant difference level at 95%.

Keywords

Field capacity

Maize yield

Maize

Plant characteristics

Sensors

Soil moisture

References

Araki, H. 2006. Water uptake of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) during exposure to O₂ deficiency and field level CO₂ concentration in the root zone. Field Crops Res. 96(1):98-105. 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.05.007

Ashraf, M. and H. Rehman. 1999. Mineral nutrient status of corn in relation to nitrate and long-term waterlogging. J. Plant Nutr. 22(8):1253-1268. 10.1080/01904169909365710

Baylar, A. and F. Ozkan. 2006. Applications of venturi principle to water aeration systems. Environ. Fluid Mech. 6(4):341-357. 10.1007/s10652-005-5664-9

Bhattarai, S.P., D.J. Midmore, and L. Pendergast. 2008. Yield, water-use efficiencies and root distribution of soybean, chickpea and pumpkin under different subsurface drip irrigation depths and oxygation treatments in vertisols. Irrig. Sci. 26(5):439-450. 10.1007/s00271-008-0112-5

Bhattarai, S.P., N. Su, and D.J. Midmore. 2005. Oxygation unlocks yield potentials of crops in oxygen-limited soil environments. Adv. Agron. 88:313-377. 10.1016/S0065-2113(05)88008-3

Bhattarai, S.P., S. Huber, and D.J. Midmore. 2004. Aerated subsurface irrigation water gives growth and yield benefits to zucchini, vegetable soybean and cotton in heavy clay soils. Ann. Appl. Biol. 144(3):285-298. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2004.tb00344.x

Chen, X., J. Dhungel, S. Bhattarai, M. Torabi, and D. Midmore. 2010. Impact of oxygation on soil respiration and crop physiological characteristics in pineapple. J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng. 28(6):543-547.

Chun, H.C., S. Lee, D.H. Gong, W.C. Kim, S.H. Lee, and K.Y. Jung. 2022. Growth characteristics and physiological responses of soybean (Glycine max L.) under excessive soil moisture stress. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 55(3):185-197. 10.7745/KJSSF.2022.55.3.185

Edwards, K.P., C.A. Madramootoo, J.K. Whalen, V.I. Adamchuk, A.S. Mat Su, and H. Benslim. 2018. Nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide emissions from surface and subsurface drip irrigated tomato fields. Can. J. Soil Sci. 98(3):389-398. 10.1139/cjss-2017-0001

Fox, R.L. and R.C. Lipps. 1964. A comparison of stable strontium and P³² as tracers for estimating alfalfa root activity. Plant Soil 20:337-350. 10.1007/BF01373824

Goorahoo, D., D. Adhikari, G. Carstensen, and D. Zoldoske. 2004. Impact of aerated subsurface irrigation water on the growth and yield of crops. Technical Paper. In Proceedings of the Irrigation Show and Education Conference, Tampa, FL, USA.

Goorahoo, D., G. Carstensen, and A. Mazzei. 2001. A pilot study on the impact of air injected into water delivered through subsurface drip irrigation tape on the growth and yield of bell peppers. California Agricultural Technology Institute, California State University, Fresno, CA, USA.

Han, K.W., H.R. Cho, A.S. Ro, B.S. Yoon, H.J. Kim, Y.O. Yun, J.I. Lee, B.K. An, B.H. Kim, S.J. Park, K.H. Jung, and Y.S. Zhang. 2014. Soil physical properties under upland cultivation as affected by clay content. p. 103-104. In Proceedings of the Korean Society of Soil Science and Fertilizer Conference, Jangsu-gun, Korea.

Huber, S. 2000. New uses for drip irrigation: Partial root zone drying and forced aeration. MSc Thesis, Technical University, Munich, Germany.

Kallenbach, C.M., D.E. Rolston, and W.R. Horwath. 2010. Cover cropping affects soil N₂O and CO₂ emissions differently depending on type of irrigation. Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 137(3-4):251-260. 10.1016/j.agee.2010.02.010

Kamara, L., R. Zartman, and R.H. Ramsey. 1991. Cotton-root distribution as a function of trickle irrigation emitter depth. Irrig. Sci. 12(3):141-144. 10.1007/BF00192285

Kaur, G., B.A. Zurweller, K.A. Nelson, P.P. Motavalli, and C.J. Dudenhoeffer. 2017. Soil waterlogging and nitrogen fertilizer management effects on corn and soybean yields. Agron. J. 109(1):97-106. 10.2134/agronj2016.07.0411

Klepper, B. 1991. Crop root system response to irrigation. Irrig. Sci. 12(3):105-108. 10.1007/BF00192280

Lessard, R., P. Rochette, E. Topp, E. Pattey, R.L. Desjardins, and G. Beaumont. 1994. Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes from poorly drained adjacent cultivated and forest sites. Can. J. Soil Sci. 74(2):139-146. 10.4141/cjss94-021

Lone, A.A. and M.Z.K. Warsi. 2009. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) to excess soil moisture (ESM) tolerance at different stages of life cycle. Bot. Res. Int. 2(3):211-217.

McHugh, A.D., S. Bhattarai, G. Lotz, and D.J. Midmore. 2008. Effects of subsurface drip irrigation rates and furrow irrigation for cotton grown on a vertisol on off-site movement of sediments, nutrients and pesticides. Agron. Sustainable Dev. 28(4):507-519. 10.1051/agro:2008034

Midmore, D.J., J. Dhungel, and S.P. Bhattarai. 2012. Aerated water irrigation (oxygation) benefits to pineapple yield, water use efficiency and crop health. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 26(1):3-16.

NAAS. 2010. Method of soil chemical analysis. National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA, Suwon, Korea.

Palta, J.A., A. Ganjeali, N.C. Turner, and K.H.M. Siddique. 2010. Effects of transient subsurface waterlogging on root growth, plant biomass and yield of chickpea. Agric. Water Manage. 97(10):1469-1476. 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.05.001

Pendergast, L., S.P. Bhattarai, and D.J. Midmore. 2013. Benefits of oxygation of subsurface drip-irrigation water for cotton in a vertosol. Crop Pasture Sci. 64(12):1171-1181. 10.1071/CP13348

Przywara, G. and W. Stępniewski. 1999. The influence of waterlogging at different temperatures on penetration depth and porosity of roots and on stomatal diffusive resistance of pea and maize seedlings. Acta Physiol. Plant. 21(4):405-411. 10.1007/s11738-999-0013-0

RDA. 2014. Handbook on food and crop environment analysis. Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Korea.

RDA. 2021. Good practice of agricultural technology 035; corn. Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Korea.

Ren, B., J. Zhang, X. Li, X. Fan, S. Dong, P. Liu, and B. Zhao. 2014. Effects of waterlogging on the yield and growth of summer maize under field conditions. Can. J. Plant Sci. 94(1):23-31. 10.4141/cjps2013-175

Sathi, K.S., A.A.C. Masud, T.I. Anee, K. Rahman, N. Ahmed, and M. Hasanuzzaman. 2022. Soybean plants under waterlogging stress: Responses and adaptation mechanisms. p. 103-134. In M. Hasanuzzaman et al. (ed.) Managing Plant Production Under Changing Environment, Springer, Singapore. 10.1007/978-981-16-5059-8_5

Schaufler, G., B. Kitzler, A. Schindlbacher, U. Skiba, M.A. Sutton, and S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern. 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions from European soils under different land use: Effects of soil moisture and temperature. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 61(5):683-696. 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01277.x

Smith, R.J., S.R. Raine, and J. Minkevich. 2005. Irrigation application efficiency and deep drainage potential under surface irrigated cotton. Agric. Water Manage. 71(2):117-130. 10.1016/j.agwat.2004.07.008

Thongbai, P., S. Milroy, M. Bange, G. Rapp, and T. Smith. 2001. Agronomic responses of cotton to low soil oxygen during waterlogging. p. 1600-1730. In Proceedings of the 10th Australian Agronomy Conference, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Wen-Quan, N., G. Chao, S. Hongbo, and W. Pute. 2011. Effects of different rhizosphere ventilation treatment on water and nutrients absorption of maize. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10(6):949-959.

Zhou, Y., Y. Li, X. Liu, K. Wang, and T. Muhammad. 2019. Synergistic improvement in spring maize yield and quality with micro/nanobubbles water oxygation. Sci. Rep. 9(1):1-10. 10.1038/s41598-019-41617-z30914701PMC6435734

Zhu, J., N. Xu, K.H. Siddique, Z. Zhang, and W. Niu. 2022. Aerated drip irrigation improves water and nitrogen uptake efficiencies of tomato roots with associated changes in the antioxidant system. Sci. Hortic. 306:111471. 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111471

Information

Publisher :Korean Society of Soil Science and Fertilizer
Publisher(Ko) :한국토양비료학회
Journal Title :Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer
Journal Title(Ko) :한국토양비료학회 학회지
Volume : 56
No :1
Pages :39-48
Received Date : 2022-11-15
Revised Date : 2023-02-06
Accepted Date : 2023-02-06
DOI :https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2023.56.1.039

Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer ISSN:0367-6315(Print) 2288-2162(Online) 한국토양비료학회 학회지

All Issue