All Issue

2022 Vol.55, Issue 4 Preview Page

Original research article

Growth Responses of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) to Irrigation and Fertilization in Saemangeum Reclaimed Land
Heekyoung Ock1
,
Kwangseung Lee2
,
Kangho Jung3
,
Suwhan Lee1
,
Yangyeol Oh1*
1Researcher, Reclaimed Land Agriculture Research Team, NICS, Wanju 55365, Korea
2Post-Doctoral, Reclaimed Land Agriculture Research Team, NICS, Wanju 55365, Korea
3Senior Researcher, Reclaimed Land Agriculture Research Team, NICS, Wanju 55365, Korea
*Corresponding Author
30 November 2022. pp. 273-285
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Irrigation is required to control salinity and drought stress but it is difficult to secure water resources with good quality in reclaimed lands. This study was conducted to 1) examine applicability of river water as irrigation resources, and 2) estimate suitable irrigation amount and nitrogen fertilization rate (NFR) according to root zone condition for kenaf in the Saemangeum reclaimed land. Under the limited rooting depth, kenaf was cultivated with four irrigation levels (600, 800, 1,000 and 1,200 mm) and four NFRs (0, 36, 84 and 120 N kg ha-1) in 2020. With the extended rooting depth, kenaf was subjected to same irrigation treatments to those in 2020 and three NFRs (0, 60 and 120 N kg ha-1). The Total organic carbon (TOC) and Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) of river water slightly exceeded the agricultural water quality standard in some periods on 2020 and 2021, but water quality generally met the standard. Kenaf growth and yield increased with irrigation of 1,000 mm, but decreased in 1,200 mm compared to those in 1,000 mm under the limited rooting condition. With extended root zone, kenaf yield continuously increased with irrigation. At irrigation of 1,200 mm, kenaf yield increased with increasing NFR. Consequently, the nitrogen fertilizer effect was amplified as soil moisture was sufficiently supplied through irrigation. It is concluded that the amount of water and fertilizer should be determined according to the environmental conditions in the Saemangeum reclaimed land.

Growth responses of kenaf to irrigation amount with 600, 800, 1,000, and 1,200 mm between 2020 and 2021 in Saemangeum reclaimed land.
Keywords
Irrigation
Kenaf
Reclaimed land
Saemangeum
References
1
Alexopoulou, E., Y. Papatheohari, M. Christou, and A. Monti. 2013. Origin, description, importance and cultivation area of kenaf. p. 1-15. In A. Monti and E. Alexopoulou (ed.) Kenaf: A multi-purpose crop for several industrial applications. Springer, London, UK. 10.1007/978-1-4471-5067-1_1
2
An, Y.J., W.M. Lee, and C.G. Yoon. 2006. Evaluation of korean water quality standards and suggestion of additional water parameters. Korean J. Limnol. 39(3):285-295.
3
APHA. 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., USA.
4
Ayers, R.S. and D.W. Westcot. 1985. Water quality for agriculture. p. 1-174. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29 Rev 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
5
Bañuelos, G.S., D.R. Bryla, and C.G. Cook. 2002. Vegetative production of kenaf and canola under irrigation in central California. Ind. Crops Prod. 15(3):237-245. 10.1016/S0926-6690(01)00119-4
6
Bosisio, M. 1988. Kenaf paper: A forest-saving alternative. USDA-ARS. Agric. Res. 36(9):6-8.
7
Carpenter, J.R. and C.A. Mitchell. 1980. Root respiration characteristics of flood-tolerant and intolerant tree species. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105(5):684-687. 10.21273/JASHS.105.5.684
8
Chun, H.C., K.Y. Jung, Y.D. Choi, S. Lee, and H.W. Kang. 2018. Growth and yield characterization of soybean (Glycine max L.) and adzuki bean (Vigna angularis L.) cultivated from paddy fields with different topographic features. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 5:536-546. 10.7745/KJSSF.2018.51.4.536
9
Chun, H.C., S.H. Lee, D.H. Gong, W.C. Kim, S.H. Lee, and K.Y. Jung. 2022. Growth characteristics and physiological responses of soybean (Glycine max L.) under excessive soil moisture stress. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 55(3):185-197. 10.7745/KJSSF.2022.55.3.185
10
Danalatos, N.G. and S.V. Archontoulis. 2010. Growth and biomass productivity of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus, L.) under different agricultural inputs and management practices in central Greece. Ind. Crops Prod. 32(3):231-240. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.04.013
11
Di Paolo, E. and M. Rinaldi. 2008. Yield response of corn to irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Res. 105(3):202-210. 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.10.004
12
Evans, D.W. and A.H. Hang. 1993. Kenaf in irrigated central Washington. p. 409-410. In J. Janick and J.E. Simon (ed.) New crops. Wiley, New York, USA.
13
Fehr, W.R. and C.E. Caviness. 1977. Stages of soybean development. p. 1-12. Special Report 80. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA.
14
Gilcreas, F.W. 1966. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. Am. J. Public Health Nation’s Health 56(3):387-388. 10.2105/AJPH.56.3.3875948695PMC1256912
15
Hossain, M.A., H. Araki, and T. Takahashi. 2011. Poor grain filling induced by waterlogging is similar to that in abnormal early ripening in wheat in Western Japan. Field Crops Res. 123(2):100-108. 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.05.005
16
Kang, C.H., I.S. Lee, J.J. Lee, and H.J. Kim. 2021. Effect of irrigation of river water and swine slurry liquid fertilizer on kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) growth cultivated using soil moisture control system in reclaimed land. Korean J. Crop Sci. 66(1):87-96.
17
Kang, C.H., W.Y. Choi, Y.J. Yoo, K.H. Choi, H.J. Kim, Y.J. Song, and C.K. Kim. 2014a. The growth phase and yield difference of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) on soil salinity in reclaimed land. Korean J. Crop Sci. 59(4):511-520. 10.7740/kjcs.2014.59.4.511
18
Kang, C.H., Y.J. Yu, K.H. Choi, H.J. Kim, Y.K. Shin, G.J. Lee, D.Y. Ko, Y.J. Song, and C.K. Kim. 2014b. Development of stable culture techniques for kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Korean J. Crop Sci. 59(3):375-384. 10.7740/kjcs.2014.59.3.375
19
Kaur, G., B.A. Zurweller, K.A. Nelson, P.P. Motavalli, and C.J. Dudenhoeffer. 2017. Soil waterlogging and nitrogen fertilizer management effects on corn and soybean yields. Agron. J. 109(1):97-106. 10.2134/agronj2016.07.0411
20
Kim, B.K., H.S. Kim, and H.J. Jo. 2020. Research on response to water quality changes according to Saemangeum development. Pending Issue. jthink Res. ISBN:978-89-6612-363-6.
21
Kim, H.W. 2013. Analysis of soil characteristics of farming sites in Saemangeum reclaimed land. Master’s Thesis, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.
22
Kim, Y.M., C.W. Lee, and Y.J. Lee. 2020. Trends of lysimeter studies to investigate nutrient leaching loss. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 53(4):677-686. 10.7745/KJSSF.2020.53.4.677
23
Ko, D.Y. 2018. Setting of standard fertilization for kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) cultivation in reclaimed land and general upland soil. Information on Agricultural Technology. Nongsaro, RDA, Junju, Korea.
24
Kulger, D.E. 1996. Kenaf commercialization: 1986-1995. p. 129-132. In J. Janick (ed.) Progress in new crops. ASHS Press, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
25
Lee, E.G. 2015. Recent agricultural drought state and case analysis. J. Korean Soc. Agric. Eng. 57(2):2-12.
26
Lee, Y.J., K.H. Han, S.B. Lee, J.K. Sung, Y.S. Song, and D.B. Lee. 2017. Nutrient leaching and crop uptake in weighing lysimeter planted with soybean as affected by water management. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 36(3):147-153. 10.5338/KJEA.2017.36.3.30
27
Lee, Y.J., S.B. Lee, and J. Sung. 2021. Optimal fertigation guide for greenhouse strawberry: Development and validation. Korean. J. Soil Sci. Fert. 54(3):322-330. 10.7745/KJSSF.2021.54.3.322
28
Li, Y., J. Li, L. Gao, and Tian, Y. 2018. Irrigation has more influence than fertilization on leaching water quality and the potential environmental risk in excessively fertilized vegetable soils. PloS ONE 13(9):e0204570. 10.1371/journal.pone.020457030261079PMC6160137
29
Liao, C.H. and W.V. Bartholomew. 1974. Relation between nitrate absorption and water transpiration by corn. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 38(3):472-477. 10.2136/sssaj1974.03615995003800030027x
30
MAFRA. 2019. Master plan of state-run reclaimed land of Korea. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affair, Sejong, Korea.
31
Mantineo, M., C. Patane, S.L. Cosentino, and G. D’Agosta. 2008. The recovery of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Ital. J. Agron. 3:537-538.
32
ME. 2000. The test methods of pollutions process in water quality. Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Korea.
33
ME. 2022. Article 10 of the framework act on environmental policy. Article 20 of the groundwater act. Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Korea.
34
Muchow, R.C. 1992. Effect of water and nitrogen supply on radiation interception and biomass accumulation of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) in a semi-arid tropical environment. Field Crops Res. 28:281-293. 10.1016/0378-4290(92)90014-Z
35
NIAST. 2010. Methods of soil chemical analysis. p. 23-165. National institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Junju, Korea.
36
O’Neill, P.M., J.F. Shanahan, J.S. Schepers, and B. Caldwell. 2004. Agronomic responses of corn hybrids from different eras to deficit and adequate levels of water and nitrogen. Agron. J. 96:1660-1667. 10.2134/agronj2004.1660
37
Pinkerton, A. and J.R. Simpson. 1986. Interactions of surface drying and subsurface nutrients affecting plant growth on acidic soil profiles from an old pasture. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 26(6):681-689. 10.1071/EA9860681
38
Ramaswamy, G.N. and E.P. Easter. 1997. Durability and aesthetic properties of kenaf/cotton blend fabrics. Text. Res. J. 67:803-808. 10.1177/004051759706701104
39
Rhine, M.D., G. Stevens, G. Shannon, A. Wrather, and D. Sleper. 2010. Yield and nutritional responses to waterlogging of soybean cultivars. Irrig. Sci. 28:135-142. 10.1007/s00271-009-0168-x
40
Rivelli, A.R., M. Perniola, E. Tarantino, and G. Disciglio. 1998. Water use and irrigation requirement of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) in Southern Italy [Basilicata]. Irrig. Drain. (Basilicate, Italy) 45(3):29-36.
41
Ro, H.M., J.M. Park, and K.Y. Kim. 1995. Effect of dissolved oxygen on the leaf water potentials, leaf nutrient compositions, root activities of ‘Tsugaru’ apple tree and the chemical environment of rhizosphere. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 36:493-499.
42
RRI. 2006. Studies on the establishment of agricultural water quality guideline for safety agricultural products. Research Report. Rural Research Institute, Korea Rural Community & Agriculture Corporation, Naju, Korea.
43
Ryu, J.H. and Y.D. Kim. 2016. Monitoring of water quality of freshwater lake and inflow river in government controlled reclaimed land. p. 475-546. Rural Development Administration, Junju, Korea.
44
Sairam, R.K., D. Kumutha, K. Ezhilmathi, P.S. Deshmukh, and G.C. Srivastava. 2008. Physiology and biochemistry of waterlogging tolerance in plants. Biol. Plant. 52:401-412. 10.1007/s10535-008-0084-6
45
SDIA. 2021. Master plan of Saemangeum. Saemangeum Development and Investment Agency, Gunsan, Korea.
46
Shin, J.H., W.H. Nam, N.K. Bang, H.J. Kim, H.U. An, and K.Y. Lee. 2020. Assessment of irrigation efficiency and water supply vulnerability using SWMM. J. Korean Soc. Agric. Eng. 62(6):380 73-83.
47
Son, Y.M., H.T. Kim, and D.W. Seo. 2008. Development for coming conversion to reclaimed farm land. p. 37-44. In Association for Research on Reclaimed Land (ed.) Reclaimed Land Research, National Institute of Crop Science, Wanju, Korea.
48
Steffens, D., B.W. Hutsch, T. Eschholz, T. Lošak, and S. Schubert. 2005. Waterlogging may inhibit plant growth primarily by nutrient deficiency rather than nutrient toxicity. Plant, Soil Environ. 51:545-552. 10.17221/3630-PSE
49
Stockle, C.O. 2001. Environmental impact of irrigation: A review. p. 1-15. In IV International Congress of Agricultural Engineering, Washington, D.C., USA.
50
Webber III, C.L. and V.K. Bledsoe. 1993. Kenaf: Production, harvesting, processing, and products. p. 416-421. In J. Janick and J.E. Simon (ed.) New crops. Wiley, New York. USA.
51
Zand-Parsa, S. and A.R. Sepaskhah. 2001. Optimal applied water and nitrogen for corn. Agric. Water Manage. 52(1):73-85. 10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00106-8
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society of Soil Science and Fertilizer
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국토양비료학회
  • Journal Title :Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국토양비료학회 학회지
  • Volume : 55
  • No :4
  • Pages :273-285
  • Received Date : 2022-08-12
  • Revised Date : 2022-11-08
  • Accepted Date : 2022-11-08
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2022.55.4.273
Journal Informaiton Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer
KJSSF Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close